Jason and the Aldridgenauts

By 5 January 2018KEY ARTICLES

Jason and the Aldridgenauts (±x)

Published on 5th January 2018
Joseph-S-R-de-Saram

Joseph S R de Saram (JSRDS)

Information Security Architect / Intelligence Analyst / Computer Scientist / Human Rights Activist / COMSEC / SIGINT / TSCM
423

Enter more text here

Background

I had noticed a Jason Aldridge from late 2015 early 2016 had been looking at my LinkedIn profile. I will locate those logs in due course but around the same time I noticed various accesses from obviously associated parties, often concurrently.

Visual Identification from 20180104

Yesterday I was looking for various lawyers to help me draft some First Incident Reports so that I can provide them to the Police in various countries – notwithstanding the fact that the Police are also associated with various criminal acts against me in which I am the victim which is the irony 🙂

I have around 800 1st connections who appear under a search of ‘Law Practice’. This is the third page yesterday:-

OBVIOUSLY ‘J A’ WITH AN OCCUPATION OF ‘D’ STICKS OUT LIKE A SORE THUMB AND ‘D’ STANDS FOR DETECTIVE OBVIOUSLY. ‘HIDING’ AMONGST LAWYERS IS JUST DUMB.

HE DOES NOT APPEAR UNDER ANY OF MY POLICE CONTACTS EITHER:-

I have 2355 1st connections who are Police-related:-

I have 2355 1st connections who are Police-related:-

and 525 1st connections who are MPS-related:-

01 Analysis of ‘Jason’

Analysis of Recommendations

The two out of the three recommendations confirm that the ‘J’ in ‘J A’ stands for ‘Jason’ – as such it is very silly masquerading as a ‘J A’ (which sticks out a mile and draws unnecessary attention to the profile‘.

Furthermore the downloaded PDF provides his name and e-mail address in any event (see further on) which defeats things entirely 🙂

Bruce Forster confirms – “His tireless efforts in promoting POCA within the MPS is exemplary and starting to bear fruit as Senior Management have finally started to recognise the true value and potential of financial investigations..

Excuse me? “Senior Management [of MPS] have finally started to recognise the true value and potential of financial investigations” is actually horseshit.

Simply reading my article about the REAL MPS AROUND 1992:-

Can I Get a Witness?

Twenty-four years ago I became involved with the UK Metropolitan Police Service - this is the short version of how I developed an interest in Law...

and referring to this paragraph:-

I met another Police officer who was from SO13 (can’t remember his name (John/Dave: something monosyllabic) but he was mean-looking) and I enjoyed a brief conversation about 56bit DES and Intelligence, Surveillance, and Reconnaissance (“ISR”).

It was apparent to me that the MPS had limited technical resources and were somewhat in the dark ages in relation to secure communications, metadata and their uses. GCHQ was essentially the MPS’ computer department. It seemed that SO13 were more interested in the terrorists’ financing of weapons and the money trail with assistance from MI6 for covert human surveillance, and MLAT requests, rather than anything else.”

MPS WAS ALREADY HARDCORE IN FINANCIAL INVESTIGATIONS AND RECOGNISED THEIR VALUE IN RELATION TO COMPLEX INVESTIGATIONS IN 1992.

SOME SAILOR FROM PORTSMOUTH WOULD OBVIOUSLY HAVE A NEGLIGIBLE IMPACT ON SOMETHING THAT HAD ALREADY REACHED AN ESTABLISHED LEVEL, 26 YEARS EARLIER IN FACT 🙂

As for a POCA expert, NOTHING I have seen in any of the intelligence that I have gathered would suggest any of the investigators have any hardcore experience of such operations.

WHICH IS WHY THEY ARE GETTING CREAMED 🙂

POCAhontas 2002

Just like the long-haired bird in the cartoon above, I was asking my local tree about 'my path and how am I ever going to find it'. The tree responded...

I would also state that Jim M and Philip Rule have both used the signature phrase “very dedicated” – a person cannot be very dedicated – they are either dedicated or not. Philip Rule, who is apparently a barrister has spelt knowledgeable in an incorrect way too and so has Jim M !!

And Bruce Forster has an odd way of spelling experience 🙂

WHAT A JOKE THIS IS!

Analysis of Skills

I would also state that Jim M and Philip Rule have both used the signature phrase “very dedicated” – a person cannot be very dedicated – they are either dedicated or not. Philip Rule, who is apparently a barrister has spelt knowledgeable in an incorrect way too and so has Jim M !!

And Bruce Forster has an odd way of spelling experience 🙂

Not sure why both ‘AML’ and ‘Anti Money Laundering’ appear but 18 endorsements for both, plus 8 for Assets Recovery, 8 for Intelligence Analysis and 5 for Intelligence does not really provide confidence in POCA when Jim M confirms “Jason is one the Met Police’s POCA experts”. These skills are prerequisites 🙂

NOW THAT’S WORRYING 🙂

I have even endorsed Jason for the bottom 5 skills, and especially the ‘Money Laundering’ only has 6

I FELT SORRY FOR HIM 🙂

02 Analysis of ‘the Aldridgenauts’

Turning now to the 62 mutual connections, I noticed that the majority of names and organisations are those whom I have already identified as associated parties.

So Jason’s profile has provided rich pickings for me. I have already obtained the data on all 62 mutual connections and about to cross-reference those parties against information on other systems to establish material and/or signature trends in already collected data and/or metadata.

IN FACT THIS INFORMATION ASSISTS ME GREATLY IN THE DRAFTING OF APPLICATIONS SUCH AS NORWICH PHARMACAL…

Naturally I will be specifically looking for them in ongoing data analysis as well. If they were to suddenly stop taking an interest in me then that would also have evidentiary significance.

DAMNED IF THEY DO, AND DAMNED IF THEY DON’T 🙂

Downloading the Profile as a PDF

And finally I downloaded the profile from LinkedIn and this is the result, which confirmed my original assertion, and provides Name and E-mail Address:-

Page: 01

Page: 02

SERIOUSLY, THIS LEVEL OF INEPTITUDE REFLECTS POORLY ON THE GOOD FOLKS AT MPS, AND OF COURSE THE BRITISH TAXPAYER IS HAVING TO FUND THIS ‘EXPERIMENT’ – “AN INVESTIGATION WITH ZERO PROSPECTS OF SUCCESS THAT FOOLS NO-ONE EXCEPT TRY-HARDS AND SYCOPHANTS WHO HAVE BOUGHT INTO IT AND NOW DON’T KNOW WHAT TO DO AGAINST HARDCORE FORENSICS CONFIRMING CELLULAR INTERCEPTION.”

How to Identify Cellular Interception via Pure Forensic Analysis

The video above is by Annie Machon, an ex-Intelligence Officer who worked for MI5. Annie is one of the few of us left who actually have Brains &....

Have a great weekend 🙂

Joseph-S-R-de-Saram

Joseph S R de Saram (JSRDS)

Information Security Architect / Intelligence Analyst / Computer Scientist / Human Rights Activist / COMSEC / SIGINT / TSCM
RHODIUM GROUP